EDUCATION
Selecting appropriate study designs to address specific research questions in occupational epidemiology
1 Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington USA and International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
2 Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University Wellington Campus, Wellington, New Zealand
3 Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor H Checkoway
University of Washington, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Box 357234, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; checko{at}u.washington.edu
Various epidemiological study designs are available to investigate illness and injury risks related to workplace exposures. The choice of study design to address a particular research question will be guided by the nature of the health outcome under study, its presumed relation to workplace exposures, and feasibility constraints. This review summarises the relative advantages and limitations of conventional study designs including cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, repeated measures studies, case-control (industry- and community-based) studies, and more recently developed variants of the nested case-control design: case-cohort and case-crossover studies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Palmer, K.
(2007). Work in brief. Occup. Environ. Med.
64: 569-569
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
