Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 4 April 2007. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.032664
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2007;64:589-594
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Clinical epidemiological study of employees exposed to surfactant blend containing perfluorononanoic acid

Diane J Mundt1, Kenneth A Mundt1, Rose S Luippold1, Michael D Schmidt2, Craig H Farr3

1 ENVIRON International Corporation, Amherst, MA, USA
2 Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
3 Arkema Inc, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr D J Mundt
ENVIRON International Corp, 28 Amity Street, Suite 2A, Amherst, MA 01002, USA; dmundt{at}environcorp.com

Introduction: An epidemiological study was conducted of a perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) surfactant blend, to investigate whether clinical differences were apparent between employees who were potentially exposed to the surfactant and those who were not exposed. The surfactant blend, which is related to other previously studied perfluorinated materials, is used in the production of some high-performance polymers.

Methods: All 630 individuals employed at a polymer production facility using PFNA (CAS No 72968-38-8) at any time between 1 January 1989 and 1 July 2003 were included in the cohort. Plausibly related laboratory test results were abstracted from annual medical examination records, including liver enzyme function and blood lipids. Detailed work histories, available for all employees, provided the basis for determining exposure category. Thirty two clinical parameters were evaluated by exposure level at five points in time, determined to reflect changes in possible exposure intensity, as well as greatest number of records available. Annual cross-sectional analyses and longitudinal analyses that accounted for multiple measurements per person were conducted separately for men and women, by exposure groups.

Results: Differences by exposure group for all laboratory measures, adjusted for age and body mass index, were small and not clinically significant. Although some statistically significant pair-wise differences were observed, these observations were not consistent between men and women, or over the five analysis windows. For the seven outcome variables (liver enzymes and blood lipids) examined in separate longitudinal models, no significant increase or decrease was observed by unit increase in cumulative exposure intensity score.

Conclusion: This is the first epidemiological study investigating the possible health effects in humans associated with exposure to PFNA blend. Based on laboratory measures assessed over more than a decade, no adverse clinical effects were detected from occupational exposure to PFNA blend.

Abbreviations: PFOA, perfluorooctanoic acid; PFNA, perfluorononanoic acid


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Palmer, K. (2007). Work in brief. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: 569-569 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs