HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: oem.2005.026351v1 64/8/541    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mikkelsen, S. Articles by Andersen, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mikkelsen, S. Articles by Andersen, J. H.

Validity of questionnaire self-reports on computer, mouse and keyboard usage during a four-week period

¹ Department of Occupational Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
² Department of Occupational Medicine, Herning Hospital, Herning, Denmark

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S Mikkelsen
Department of Occupational Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Nordre Ringvej, DK 2600 Glostrup, Denmark; simi{at}glostruphosp.kbhamt.dk

Objective: To examine the validity and potential biases in self-reports of computer, mouse and keyboard usage times, compared with objective recordings.

Methods: A study population of 1211 people was asked in a questionnaire to estimate the average time they had worked with computer, mouse and keyboard during the past four working weeks. During the same period, a software program recorded these activities objectively. The study was part of a one-year follow-up study from 2000–1 of musculoskeletal outcomes among Danish computer workers.

Results: Self-reports on computer, mouse and keyboard usage times were positively associated with objectively measured activity, but the validity was low. Self-reports explained only between a quarter and a third of the variance of objectively measured activity, and were even lower for one measure (keyboard time). Self-reports overestimated usage times. Overestimation was large at low levels and declined with increasing levels of objectively measured activity. Mouse usage time proportion was an exception with a near 1:1 relation. Variability in objectively measured activity, arm pain, gender and age influenced self-reports in a systematic way, but the effects were modest and sometimes in different directions.

Conclusion: Self-reported durations of computer activities are positively associated with objective measures but they are quite inaccurate. Studies using self-reports to establish relations between computer work times and musculoskeletal pain could be biased and lead to falsely increased or decreased risk estimates.

Abbreviations: NUDATA, Neck and Upper extremity Disorders Among Technical Assistants; WPR, WorkPace Recorder

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J H Andersen, M Harhoff, S Grimstrup, I Vilstrup, C F Lassen, L P A Brandt, A I Kryger, E Overgaard, K D Hansen, and S Mikkelsen Computer mouse use predicts acute pain but not prolonged or chronic pain in the neck and shoulder Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2008; 65(2): 126 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]