Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 15 February 2007. doi:10.1136/oem.2006.029322
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2007;64:454-460
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The impact of OSHA recordkeeping regulation changes on occupational injury and illness trends in the US: a time-series analysis

Lee S Friedman, Linda Forst

University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr L S Friedman
University of Illinois at Chicago, 2121W Taylor St, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; lfriedman{at}tspri.org

Objectives: The Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII), based on Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) logs, indicates that the number of occupational injuries and illnesses in the US has steadily declined by 35.8% between 1992–2003. However, major changes to the OSHA recordkeeping standard occurred in 1995 and 2001. The authors assessed the relation between changes in OSHA recordkeeping regulations and the trend in occupational injuries and illnesses.

Methods: SOII data available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for years 1992–2003 were collected. The authors assessed time series data using join-point regression models.

Results: Before the first major recordkeeping change in 1995, injuries and illnesses declined annually by 0.5%. In the period 1995–2000 the slope declined by 3.1% annually (95% CI –3.7% to –2.5%), followed by another more precipitous decline occurring in 2001–2003 (–8.3%; 95% CI –10.0% to –6.6%). When stratifying the data, the authors continued to observe significant changes occurring in 1995 and 2001.

Conclusions: The substantial declines in the number of injuries and illnesses correspond directly with changes in OSHA recordkeeping rules. Changes in employment, productivity, OSHA enforcement activity and sampling error do not explain the large decline. Based on the baseline slope (join-point regression analysis, 1992–4), the authors expected a decline of 407 964 injuries and illnesses during the period of follow-up if no intervention occurred; they actually observed a decline of 2.4 million injuries and illnesses of which 2 million or 83% of the decline can be attributed to the change in the OSHA recordkeeping rules.

Abbreviations: BLS, Bureau of Labor Statistics; NEISS, National Electronic Injury Surveillance System; OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration; SOII, Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Are work-related conditions less common or were their definitions changed?
K D Rosenman
Occup. Environ. Med. 2007 64: 429-430. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Rosenman, K D (2007). Are work-related conditions less common or were their definitions changed?. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: 429-430 [Full Text]  
  • Loomis, D. (2007). Work in brief. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: 429-429 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs