REVIEW

Should office workers spend fewer hours at their computer? A systematic review of the literature

S IJmker¹, M A Huysmans³, B M Blatter², A J van der Beek¹, W van Mechelen¹, P M Bongers²

¹ Department of Public and Occupational Health, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO), VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
² TNO Quality of Life, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
³ Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences (IFKB), Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
S IJmker
Body@Work TNO VUmc, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO), Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands; s.ijmker{at}vumc.nl

Worldwide, millions of office workers use a computer. Reports of adverse health effects due to computer use have received considerable media attention. This systematic review summarises the evidence for a relationship between the duration of work time spent using the computer and the incidence of hand–arm and neck–shoulder symptoms and disorders. Several databases were systematically searched up to 6 November 2005. Two reviewers independently selected articles that presented a risk estimate for the duration of computer use, included an outcome measure related to hand–arm or neck–shoulder symptoms or disorders, and had a longitudinal study design. The strength of the evidence was based on methodological quality and consistency of the results. Nine relevant articles were identified, of which six were rated as high quality. Moderate evidence was concluded for a positive association between the duration of mouse use and hand–arm symptoms. For this association, indications for a dose–response relationship were found. Risk estimates were in general stronger for the hand–arm region than for the neck–shoulder region, and stronger for mouse use than for total computer use and keyboard use. A pathophysiological model focusing on the overuse of muscles during computer use supports these differences. Future studies are needed to improve our understanding of safe levels of computer use by measuring the duration of computer use in a more objective way, differentiating between total computer use, mouse use and keyboard use, attaining sufficient exposure contrast, and collecting data on disability caused by symptoms.

Abbreviations: NUDATA, Neck and Upper extremity Disorders Among Technical Assistants

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Meijer, E M, Sluiter, J K, Frings-Dresen, M H W (2009). Effectiveness of a feedback signal in a computer mouse on upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms: a randomised controlled trial with an 8-month follow-up. Occup. Environ. Med. 66: 305-311 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Houwink, A., Oude Hengel, K. M., Odell, D., Dennerlein, J. T. (2009). Providing Training Enhances the Biomechanical Improvements of an Alternative Computer Mouse Design. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51: 46-55 [Abstract]  
• Burton, A. K., Kendall, N. A. S., Pearce, B. G., Birrell, L. N., Bainbridge, L. C. (2009). Management of work-relevant upper limb disorders: a review. Occup Med (Lond) 59: 44-52 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Janwantanakul, P., Pensri, P., Jiamjarasrangsri, V., Sinsongsook, T. (2008). Prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal symptoms among office workers. Occup Med (Lond) 58: 436-438 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Palmer, K. (2007). Work in brief. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: e211-e211 [Full Text]