HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: oem.2006.029017v2 64/2/93    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hajat, S Articles by Lachowycz, K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hajat, S Articles by Lachowycz, K Topic Collections Editor's choice

Heat-related and cold-related deaths in England and Wales: who is at risk?

Public & Environmental Health Research Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S Hajat
Public & Environmental Health Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK;shakoor.hajat{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Background: Despite the high burden from exposure to both hot and cold weather each year in England and Wales, there has been relatively little investigation on who is most at risk, resulting in uncertainties in informing government interventions.

Objective: To determine the subgroups of the population that are most vulnerable to heat-related and cold-related mortality.

Methods: Ecological time-series study of daily mortality in all regions of England and Wales between 1993 and 2003, with postcode linkage of individual deaths to a UK database of all care and nursing homes, and 2001 UK census small-area indicators.

Results: A risk of mortality was observed for both heat and cold exposure in all regions, with the strongest heat effects in London and strongest cold effects in the Eastern region. For all regions, a mean relative risk of 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.03) was estimated per degree increase above the heat threshold, defined as the 95th centile of the temperature distribution in each region, and 1.06 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.06) per degree decrease below the cold threshold (set at the 5th centile). Elderly people, particularly those in nursing and care homes, were most vulnerable. The greatest risk of heat mortality was observed for respiratory and external causes, and in women, which remained after control for age. Vulnerability to either heat or cold was not modified by deprivation, except in rural populations where cold effects were slightly stronger in more deprived areas.

Conclusions: Interventions to reduce vulnerability to both hot and cold weather should target all elderly people. Specific interventions should also be developed for people in nursing and care homes as heat illness is easily preventable.

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. J. Mahoney, W. L. Biffl, and W. G. Cioffi Analytic Review: Mass-Casualty Incidents: How Does an ICU Prepare? J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2008; 23(4): 219 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Page, S. Hajat, and R. S. Kovats Authors' reply The British Journal of Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 191(6): 560 - 561. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Palmer Work in brief Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2007; 64(2): 71 - 71. [Full Text] [PDF]