Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 14 September 2006. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.025924
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2007;64:53-59
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Do ambient noise exposure levels predict hearing loss in a modern industrial cohort?

P M Rabinowitz1, D Galusha1, C Dixon-Ernst2, M D Slade1, M R Cullen1

1 Yale University School of Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
2 Alcoa, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Correspondence to:
Assistant Professor P M Rabinowitz
Yale University School of Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, 135 College Street, 3rd Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Peter.rabinowitz{at}yale.edu

Background: Much of what is known about the exposure–response relationship between occupational noise exposures and hearing loss comes from cross-sectional studies conducted before the widespread implementation of workplace hearing conservation programmes. Little is known about the current relationship of ambient noise exposure measurements to hearing loss risk.

Aim: To examine the relationship between rates of high frequency hearing loss and measured levels of noise exposure in a modern industrial workforce.

Methods: Ten-year hearing loss rates were determined for 6217 employees of an aluminium manufacturing company. Industrial hygiene and human resources records allowed for reconstruction of individual noise exposures. Hearing loss rates were compared to ANSI 3.44 predictions based on age and noise exposure. Associations between hearing loss, noise exposure, and covariate risk factors were assessed using multivariate regression.

Results: Workers in higher ambient noise jobs tended to experience less high frequency hearing loss than co-workers exposed at lower noise levels. This trend was also seen in stratified analyses of white males and non-hunters. At higher noise exposure levels, the magnitude of hearing loss was less than predicted by ANSI 3.44 formulae. There was no indication that a healthy worker effect could explain these findings. The majority of 10 dB standard threshold shifts (STS) occurred in workers whose calculated ambient noise exposures were less than or equal to 85 dBA.

Conclusions: In this modern industrial cohort, hearing conservation efforts appear to be reducing hearing loss rates, especially at higher ambient noise levels. This could be related to differential use of hearing protection. The greatest burden of preventable occupational hearing loss was found in workers whose noise exposure averaged 85 dBA or less. To further reduce rates of occupational hearing loss, hearing conservation programmes may require innovative approaches targeting workers with noise exposures close to 85 dBA.

Keywords: hearing loss, noise induced; noise; occupational exposure; hearing conservation; occupational medicine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Rabinowitz, P M, Galusha, D, Slade, M D, Dixon-Ernst, C, O'Neill, A, Fiellin, M, Cullen, M R (2008). Organic solvent exposure and hearing loss in a cohort of aluminium workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 65: 230-235 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs