ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Validation of an asthma questionnaire for use in healthcare workers
1 The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
2 Department of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Health Services Research, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
3 Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
4 Municipal Institut of Medical Research (IMIM-IMAS), Barcelona, Spain
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G L Delclos
The University of TexasHouston, School of Public Health, 1200 Herman Pressler St, Suite RAS W1018, Houston, TX-77030, USA; George.Delclos{at}uth.tmc.edu
Background: Previous studies have described increased occurrence of asthma among healthcare workers, but to our knowledge there are no validated survey questionnaires with which to study this occupational group.
Aims: To develop, validate, and refine a new survey instrument on asthma for use in epidemiological studies of healthcare workers.
Methods: An initial draft questionnaire, designed by a multidisciplinary team, used previously validated questions where possible; the occupational exposure section was developed by updating health services specific chemical lists through hospital walk-through surveys and review of material safety data sheets. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted in 118 non-smoking subjects, who also underwent bronchial challenge testing, an interview with an industrial hygienist, and measurement of specific IgE antibodies to common aeroallergens.
Results: The final version consisted of 43 main questions in four sections. Time to completion of the questionnaire ranged from 13 to 25 minutes. Testretest reliability of asthma and allergy items ranged from 75% to 94%, and internal consistency for these items was excellent (Cronbachs
0.86). Against methacholine challenge, an eight item combination of asthma related symptoms had a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 70%; against a physician diagnosis of asthma, this same combination showed a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 98%. Agreement between self-reported exposures and industrial hygienist review was similar to previous studies and only moderate, indicating the need to incorporate more reliable methods of exposure assessment. Against the aerollergen panel, the best combinations of sensitivity and specificity were obtained for a history of allergies to dust, dust mite, and animals.
Conclusions: Initial evaluation of this new questionnaire indicates good validity and reliability, and further field testing and cross-validation in a larger healthcare worker population is in progress. The need for development of more reliable occupational exposure assessment methods that go beyond self-report is underscored.
Abbreviations: DFP, discriminant function predictor; HCW, healthcare worker; MD asthma, physician diagnosis of asthma
Keywords: asthma; questionnaire validation; healthcare workers
Relevant Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Occup. Environ. Med. 2006 63: 221-226.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Arif, A A, Delclos, G L, Serra, C
(2009). Occupational exposures and asthma among nursing professionals. Occup. Environ. Med.
66: 274-278
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Delclos, G. L., Gimeno, D., Arif, A. A., Benavides, F. G., Zock, J.-P.
(2009). Occupational Exposures and Asthma in Health-Care Workers: Comparison of Self-Reports With a Workplace-Specific Job Exposure Matrix. Am J Epidemiol
169: 581-587
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Lusk, C., Delclos, G. L., Burau, K., Drawhorn, D. D., Aday, L. A.
(2007). Mail Versus Internet Surveys: Determinants of Method of Response Preferences Among Health Professionals. Eval Health Prof
30: 186-201
[Abstract] -
Delclos, G. L., Gimeno, D., Arif, A. A., Burau, K. D., Carson, A., Lusk, C., Stock, T., Symanski, E., Whitehead, L. W., Zock, J.-P., Benavides, F. G., Anto, J. M.
(2007). Occupational Risk Factors and Asthma among Health Care Professionals. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
175: 667-675
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
