ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The effectiveness of graded activity for low back pain in occupational healthcare

I A Steenstra¹, J R Anema^2,3,5, P M Bongers^2,4,5, H C W de Vet², D L Knol⁶, W van Mechelen^2,3,5

¹ Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
² Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
³ Department of Social Medicine VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
⁴ TNO Work and Employment, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
⁵ Body@Work, Research Center Physical Activity, Work and Health, TNO-VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
⁶ Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Dr P M Bongers
van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands; paulien.bongers{at}tno.nl

Background: Low back pain is a common medical and social problem associated with disability and absence from work. Knowledge on effective return to work (RTW) interventions is scarce.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of graded activity as part of a multistage RTW programme.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Occupational healthcare.

Subjects: 112 workers absent from work for more than eight weeks due to low back pain were randomised to either graded activity (n = 55) or usual care (n = 57).

Intervention: Graded activity, a physical exercise programme aimed at RTW based on operant-conditioning behavioural principles.

Main outcome measures: The number of days off work until first RTW for more then 28 days, total number of days on sick leave during follow up, functional status, and severity of pain. Follow up was 26 weeks.

Results: Graded activity prolonged RTW. Median time until RTW was equal to the total number of days on sick leave and was 139 (IQR = 69) days in the graded activity group and 111 (IQR = 76) days in the usual care group (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.86). An interaction between a prior workplace intervention and graded activity, together with a delay in the start of the graded activity intervention, explained most of the delay in RTW (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.84 without prior intervention and 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.81 with prior intervention). Graded activity did not improve pain or functional status clinically significantly.

Conclusions: Graded activity was not effective for any of the outcome measures. Different interventions combined can lead to a delay in RTW. Delay in referral to graded activity delays RTW. In implementing graded activity special attention should be paid to the structure and process of care.

Abbreviations: GP, general practitioner; OP, occupational physician; PT, physiotherapist; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RTW, return to work

Keywords: low back pain; graded activity; randomised controlled trial; effectiveness; cognitive behavioural; return-to-work

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Werner, E. L., Laerum, E., Wormgoor, M. E. A., Lindh, E., Indahl, A. (2007). Peer support in an occupational setting preventing LBP-related sick leave. Occup Med (Lond) 57: 590-595 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• CHURCH, E. J., ODLE, T. G. (2007). Diagnosis and Treatment Of back Pain. radtech 79: 126-151 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Palmer, K. (2006). Work in brief. Occup. Environ. Med. 63: 717a-717a [Full Text]