ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The London Underground: dust and hazards to health

A Seaton¹, J Cherrie¹, M Dennekamp², K Donaldson³, J F Hurley¹, C L Tran¹

¹ Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
² Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Aberdeen University
³ ELEGI Laboratory, Edinburgh University

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Emeritus Professor A Seaton
Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK; a.seaton{at}abdn.ac.uk

Aims: To assess hazards associated with exposure to dust in the London Underground railway and to provide an informed opinion on the risks to workers and the travelling public of exposure to tunnel dust.

Methods: Concentrations of dust, as mass (PM_2.5) and particle number, were measured at different underground stations and in train cabs; its size and composition were analysed; likely maximal exposures of staff and passengers were estimated; and in vitro toxicological testing of sample dusts in comparison with other dusts was performed.

Results: Concentrations on station platforms were 270–480 µg/m³ PM_2.5 and 14 000–29 000 particles/cm³. Cab concentrations over a shift averaged 130–200 µg/m³ and 17 000–23 000 particles/cm³. The dust comprised by mass approximately 67% iron oxide, 1–2% quartz, and traces of other metals, the residue being volatile matter. The finest particles are drawn underground from the surface while the coarser dust is generated by interaction of brakes, wheels, and rails. Taking account of durations of exposure, drivers and station staff would have maximum exposures of about 200 µg/m³ over eight hours; the occupational exposure standard for welding fume, as iron oxide, is 5 mg/m³ over an eight hour shift. Toxicology showed the dust to have cytotoxic and inflammatory potential at high doses, consistent with its composition largely of iron oxide.

Discussion: It is unjustifiable to compare PM_2.5 exposure underground with that on the surface, since the adverse effects of iron oxide and combustion generated particles differ. Concentrations of ultrafine particles are lower and of coarser (PM_2.5) particles higher underground than on the surface. The concentrations underground are well below allowable workplace concentrations for iron oxide and unlikely to represent a significant cumulative risk to the health of workers or commuters.

Abbreviations: LU, London Underground; PM, particulate matter; PNC, particle number concentration

Keywords: dust sampling; iron oxide dust; particle counts; toxicology; underground railways

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

The London Underground: time for a thorough clean-up?

R Colvile
Occup. Environ. Med. 2005 62: 354. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Respiratory protective equipment

R M Howie
Occup. Environ. Med. 2005 62: 423-428. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wilson, J., Murray, V., Kettle, J N. (2009). The July 2005 London bombings: environmental monitoring, health risk assessment and lessons identified for major incident response. Occup. Environ. Med. 66: 642-643 [Full Text]  
• Bigert, C, Alderling, M, Svartengren, M, Plato, N, de Faire, U, Gustavsson, P (2008). Blood markers of inflammation and coagulation and exposure to airborne particles in employees in the Stockholm underground. Occup. Environ. Med. 65: 655-658 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Han, S. G., Kim, Y., Kashon, M. L., Pack, D. L., Castranova, V., Vallyathan, V. (2005). Correlates of Oxidative Stress and Free-Radical Activity in Serum from Asymptomatic Shipyard Welders. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 172: 1541-1548 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2005). Minerva. BMJ 330: 1398-1398 [Full Text]  
• Colvile, R (2005). The London Underground: time for a thorough clean-up?. Occup. Environ. Med. 62: 354-354 [Full Text]  
• Palmer, K. (2005). Work in brief. Occup. Environ. Med. 62: 351-351 [Full Text]