Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2005;62:885-889; doi:10.1136/oem.2005.020834
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The effect of asbestosis on lung cancer risk beyond the dose related effect of asbestos alone

A Reid1, N de Klerk1, G L Ambrosini1, N Olsen1, S C Pang2, G Berry3 and A W Musk1

1 School of Population Health, University of Western Australia
2 Perth Chest Clinic, Health Department of Western Australia
3 School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MsA Reid
Occupational & Environmental Epidemiology Group, School of Population Health, M435, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia; alisonr{at}sph.uwa.edu.au

Aims: To determine if the presence of asbestosis is a prerequisite for lung cancer in subjects with known exposure to blue asbestos (crocidolite).

Methods: Former workers and residents of Wittenoom with known amounts of asbestos exposure (duration, intensity, and time since first exposure), current chest x ray and smoking information, participating in a cancer prevention programme (n = 1988) were studied. The first plain chest radiograph taken at the time of recruitment into the cancer prevention programme was examined for radiographic evidence of asbestosis according to the UICC (ILO) classification. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to relate asbestosis, asbestos exposure, and lung cancer.

Results: Between 1990 and 2002 there were 58 cases of lung cancer. Thirty six per cent of cases had radiographic evidence of asbestosis compared to 12% of study participants. Smoking status was the strongest predictor of lung cancer, with current smokers (OR = 26.5, 95% CI 3.5 to 198) having the greatest risk. Radiographic asbestosis (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.46) and asbestos exposure (OR = 1.21 per f/ml-year, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.42) were significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. There was an increased risk of lung cancer with increasing exposure in those without asbestosis.

Conclusion: In this cohort of former workers and residents of Wittenoom, asbestosis is not a mandatory precursor for asbestos related lung cancer. These findings support the hypothesis that it is the asbestos fibres per se that cause lung cancer, which can develop with or without the presence of asbestosis.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio

Keywords: asbestosis; lung cancer; Wittenoom; crocidolite


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs