ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Examining the associations between physical work demands and work injury rates between men and women in Ontario, 1990–2000

P M Smith¹ and C A Mustard²

¹ Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Canada
² Institute for Work & Health, and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr P Smith
Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Ave, Suite 800, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2E9; psmith{at}iwh.on.ca

Aims: To describe the decline in injury rates between 1990 and 2000 within occupations stratified across three levels of physical demands and gender, adjusting for industry, in Canada’s largest province.

Methods: Records of injury compensation claims were obtained from the Ontario Workplace Safety & Insurance Board. The population likely to be insured by the Ontario Workplace Safety & Insurance Board was estimated from Statistics Canada’s Labour Force Survey. Injury rates were calculated by three broad levels of physical demands, separately for men and women.

Results: Injury rates decreased across each grouping of lower physical demands at work for both men and women, with the largest absolute differences in manual occupational groups (high physical demands). Occupations classified as manual (high physical demands) and mixed (moderate physical demands) showed larger differences in injury rates between genders than did non-manual (low physical demands), although the directions of these differences were not always consistent across different natures of injury classification.

Conclusions: The absolute reduction in injury rates in Ontario between 1990 and 2000 was dominated by the reduction in injury rates for men and women in manual and mixed occupations. However, not all types of injury have declined to the same extent. A large proportion of differences in injury rates between men and women can be attributed to the differential labour force participation across occupations and industries, as well as the differential tasks within occupational groups.

Keywords: work injury; gender; injury rates; physical demands

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Work in brief

Dana Loomis
Occup. Environ. Med. 2004 61: 727. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Smith, P M, Mustard, C A (2009). Comparing the risk of work-related injuries between immigrants to Canada and Canadian-born labour market participants. Occup. Environ. Med. 66: 361-367 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Taiwo, O. A., Cantley, L. F., Slade, M. D., Pollack, K. M., Vegso, S., Fiellin, M. G., Cullen, M. R. (2009). Sex Differences in Injury Patterns Among Workers in Heavy Manufacturing. Am J Epidemiol 169: 161-166 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Breslin, F. C., Tompa, E., Mustard, C., Zhao, R., Smith, P., Hogg-Johnson, S. (2007). Association Between the Decline in Workers' Compensation Claims and Workforce Composition and Job Characteristics in Ontario, Canada. Am. J. Public Health 97: 453-455 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Smith, P. M, Mustard, C. A (2007). How many employees receive safety training during their first year of a new job?. Inj. Prev. 13: 37-41 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Breslin, F C, Smith, P (2006). Trial by fire: a multivariate examination of the relation between job tenure and work injuries. Occup. Environ. Med. 63: 27-32 [Abstract] [Full Text]