ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Predictors of re-employment and quality of life in NHS staff one year after early retirement because of ill health; a national prospective study

S Pattani¹, N Constantinovici², S Williams¹

¹ Occupational Health and Safety Unit, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK
² Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School of the University of London, London NW3 2PF, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S Williams
Occupational Health and Safety Unit, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK; sian.williams{at}royalfree.nhs.uk

Aims: To measure changes in health related quality of life and employment status of NHS staff one year after early retirement because of ill health, and to identify predictors of re-employment.

Methods: A national cohort of 1317 NHS staff taking early retirement because of ill health in 1998 was recruited. Postal questionnaires were used to assess their quality of life (SF-36) and employment status 12 months after retirement.

Results: A total of 1143 (87%) ill health retirees responded; 152 (13%) retirees were working at one year, mostly part-time, and 22% of them were re-employed by the NHS. Independent predictors of re-employment were: living in England rather than Wales and occupation of doctor. There was an increased likelihood of re-employment with reducing age and increasing quality of life at baseline. Retirees’ quality of life improved from baseline to one year after ill health retirement, but at one year still remained lower than the general population. Improvements in physical and mental component scores were greater in those working at one year compared with those not working.

Conclusion: Reducing ill health retirement is likely to be of benefit to the individual, the NHS, and the economy. Results suggest that such a reduction may be possible and the identified predictors of re-employment may help in this process.

Keywords: early; employment; ill health; quality of life; retirement

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Why quality of life should matter to occupational health researchers

P D Blanc
Occup. Environ. Med. 2004 61: 571. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Carlsen, K., Oksbjerg Dalton, S., Frederiksen, K., Diderichsen, F., Johansen, C. (2008). Cancer and the risk for taking early retirement pension: A Danish cohort study. Scand J Public Health 36: 117-125 [Abstract]  
• Irgens, A., Gronning, M., Troland, K., Sundal, E., Nyland, H., Thorsen, E. (2007). Reduced health-related quality of life in former North Sea divers is associated with decompression sickness. Occup Med (Lond) 57: 349-354 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Solomon, C., Poole, J., Palmer, K. T, Coggon, D. (2007). Health-related job loss: findings from a community-based survey. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: 144-149 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brown, J., Gilmour, W. H., Macdonald, E. B. (2006). Return to work after ill-health retirement in Scottish NHS staff and teachers. Occup Med (Lond) 56: 480-484 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Blanc, P D (2004). Why quality of life should matter to occupational health researchers. Occup. Environ. Med. 61: 571-571 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Re-employment of NHS staff following retirement on the grounds of ill-health

Mark S Newson-Smith

Occup Environ Med Online, 9 Sep 2004 [Full text]