ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A case-crossover study of transient risk factors for occupational acute hand injury

G S Sorock¹, D A Lombardi², R Hauser³, E A Eisen³, R F Herrick³, M A Mittleman³

¹ Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
² Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA
³ Occupational Health Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D A Lombardi
Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA; david.lombardi{at}libertymutual.com

Background: Workers with acute hand injuries account for over 1 000 000 emergency department visits annually in the United States.

Aims: To determine potential transient risk factors for occupational acute hand injury.

Methods: Subjects were recruited from 23 occupational health clinics in five northeastern states in the USA. In a telephone interview, subjects were asked to report the occurrence of seven potential risk factors within a 90-minute time period before an acute hand injury. Each case also provided control information on exposures during the month before the injury. The self-matched feature of the study design controlled for stable between-person confounders.

Results: A total of 1166 subjects were interviewed (891 men, 275 women), with a mean age (SD) of 37.2 years (11.4). The median time interval between injury and interview was 1.3 days. Sixty three per cent of subjects had a laceration. The relative risk of a hand injury was increased when working with equipment, tools, or work pieces not performing as expected (11.0, 95% CI 9.4 to 12.8), or when using a different work method to do a task (10.5, 95% CI 8.7 to 12.7). Other transient factors in decreasing order of relative risk were doing an unusual task, being distracted, and being rushed. Wearing gloves reduced the relative risk by 60% (0.4, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.5). Occupational category, job experience, and safety training were found to alter several of these effects.

Conclusion: The results suggest the importance of these transient, potentially modifiable factors in the aetiology of acute hand injury at work. Attempts to modify these exposures by various strategies may reduce the incidence of acute hand injury at work.

Keywords: hand; injury; occupational; case-crossover; epidemiology

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Chen, S-Y, Fong, P-C, Lin, S-F, Chang, C-H, Chan, C-C (2009). A case-crossover study on transient risk factors of work-related eye injuries. Occup. Environ. Med. 66: 517-522 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kucera, K L, Loomis, D, Marshall, S W (2008). A case crossover study of triggers for hand injuries in commercial fishing. Occup. Environ. Med. 65: 336-341 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Checkoway, H., Pearce, N., Kriebel, D. (2007). Selecting appropriate study designs to address specific research questions in occupational epidemiology. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: 633-638 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jin, K., Lombardi, D. A, Courtney, T. K, Sorock, G. S, Perry, M. J, Chen, H., Wang, X., Liang, Y. (2007). The challenge of cross-cultural collaborative research: lessons learnt from a pilot case-crossover study of severe occupational hand trauma in the People's Republic of China. Inj. Prev. 13: 133-136 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chow, C Y, Lee, H, Lau, J, Yu, I T S (2007). Transient risk factors for acute traumatic hand injuries: a case-crossover study in Hong Kong. Occup. Environ. Med. 64: 47-52 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Loomis, D (2005). Long work hours and occupational injuries: new evidence on upstream causes. Occup. Environ. Med. 62: 585-585 [Full Text]  
• Checkoway, H (2004). Case-crossover designs in occupational health. Occup. Environ. Med. 61: 953-954 [Full Text]