Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2004;61:239-246
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2004;61:239-246
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers

A M Garcia1, P Boix2, C Canosa3

1 University of Valencia, Spain
2 Trade Union Institution of Work, Environment and Health (ISTAS), Valencia, Spain
3 EMER-GFK, Valencia, Spain

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A M Garcia
Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, University of Valencia, Avda. Tarongers s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain; anagar{at}uv.es

Aims: To explore the relation between safety climate (workers’ perceptions regarding management’s attitudes towards occupational safety and health) and workers’ behaviour at work.

Methods: Cross sectional survey of workers at the pottery industry in Castellon, Spain. Sampling was stratified by plant size and workers’ gender, according to data on the working population at this setting. A total of 734 production workers were interviewed. Information was collected on safety climate and workers’ behaviour towards occupational risks with a specific questionnaire. A safety climate index (SCI, scale 0–100) was constructed adding scores for each item measuring safety climate in the questionnaire. Workers’ unsafe behaviour was analysed for the different safety climate index levels.

Results: Mean score for SCI was 71.90 (SD 19.19). There were no differences in SCI scores according to age, gender, education, children at charge, seniority at work, or type of employment. Small workplaces (<50 workers) showed significantly worse SCI (mean 67.23, SD 19.73) than the largest factories (>200 workers). Lower levels of SCI (SCI <50) were related to workers’ unsafe behaviours (full/high accord with the statement "I excessively expose myself to hazards in my work", adjusted odds ratio ORa 2.79, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.88), and to lack of compliance with safety rules (ORa 12.83, 95% CI 5.92 to 27.80).

Conclusions: Safety climate measures workers’ perception of organisational factors related to occupational health and safety (for example, management commitment to risk prevention or priorities of safety versus production). In this study these factors are strongly associated with workers’ attitudes towards safety at work. Longitudinal studies can further clarify the relation between safety climate and workers’ behaviour regarding occupational safety and health.

Keywords: safety climate; safety management; worker behaviour


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Edelson, J., Neitzel, R., Meischke, H., Daniell, W., Sheppard, L., Stover, B., Seixas, N. (2009). Predictors of Hearing Protection Use in Construction Workers. ANN OCCUP HYG 53: 605-615 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Garcia, A. M, Lopez-Jacob, M. J., Dudzinski, I., Gadea, R., Rodrigo, F. (2007). Factors associated with the activities of safety representatives in Spanish workplaces. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 61: 784-790 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs