ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Accuracy of task recall for epidemiological exposure assessment to construction noise

C K Reeb-Whitaker¹, N S Seixas², L Sheppard², R Neitzel²

¹ Washington Department of Labor and Industries, Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, PO Box 44330, Olympia, Washington 98504, USA
² University of Washington, Department of Environmental Health, Seattle, Washington, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
C Reeb-Whitaker
Washington Department of Labor and Industries, Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, PO Box 44330, Olympia, Washington 98504, USA; whca235{at}Lni.wa.gov

Aims: To validate the accuracy of construction worker recall of task and environment based information; and to evaluate the effect of task recall on estimates of noise exposure.

Methods: A cohort of 25 construction workers recorded tasks daily and had dosimetry measurements weekly for six weeks. Worker recall of tasks reported on the daily activity cards was validated with research observations and compared directly to task recall at a six month interview.

Results: The mean L_EQ noise exposure level (dBA) from dosimeter measurements was 89.9 (n = 61) and 83.3 (n = 47) for carpenters and electricians, respectively. The percentage time at tasks reported during the interview was compared to that calculated from daily activity cards; only 2/22 tasks were different at the nominal 5% significance level. The accuracy, based on bias and precision, of percentage time reported for tasks from the interview was 53–100% (median 91%). For carpenters, the difference in noise estimates derived from activity cards (mean 91.9 dBA) was not different from those derived from the questionnaire (mean 91.7 dBA). This trend held for electricians as well. For all subjects, noise estimates derived from the activity card and the questionnaire were strongly correlated with dosimetry measurements. The average difference between the noise estimate derived from the questionnaire and dosimetry measurements was 2.0 dBA, and was independent of the actual exposure level.

Conclusions: Six months after tasks were performed, construction workers were able to accurately recall the percentage time they spent at various tasks. Estimates of noise exposure based on long term recall (questionnaire) were no different from estimates derived from daily activity cards and were strongly correlated with dosimetry measurements, overestimating the level on average by 2.0 dBA.

Keywords: task based assessment; recall accuracy; noise exposure

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Edelson, J., Neitzel, R., Meischke, H., Daniell, W., Sheppard, L., Stover, B., Seixas, N. (2009). Predictors of Hearing Protection Use in Construction Workers. ANN OCCUP HYG 53: 605-615 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Virji, M. A., Woskie, S. R., Waters, M., Brueck, S., Stancescu, D., Gore, R., Estill, C., Prince, M. (2009). Agreement between Task-Based Estimates of the Full-Shift Noise Exposure and the Full-Shift Noise Dosimetry. ANN OCCUP HYG 53: 201-214 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Neitzel, R., Daniell, W., Sheppard, L., Davies, H., Seixas, N. (2009). Comparison of Perceived and Quantitative Measures of Occupational Noise Exposure. ANN OCCUP HYG 53: 41-54 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• SEIXAS, N., NEITZEL, R., SHEPPARD, L., GOLDMAN, B. (2005). Alternative Metrics for Noise Exposure Among Construction Workers. ANN OCCUP HYG 49: 493-502 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Seixas, N S, Kujawa, S G, Norton, S, Sheppard, L, Neitzel, R, Slee, A (2004). Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults. Occup. Environ. Med. 61: 899-907 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• NEITZEL, R., SEIXAS, N., GOLDMAN, B., DANIELL, W. (2004). Contributions of Non-occupational Activities to Total Noise Exposure of Construction Workers. ANN OCCUP HYG 48: 463-473 [Abstract] [Full Text]