ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Surveillance of noise exposure in the Danish workplace: a baseline survey

S Kock¹, T Andersen¹, H A Kolstad¹, B Kofoed-Nielsen², F Wiesler² and J P Bonde¹

¹ Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
² Department of Audiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Prof. J P Bonde
Department of Occupational Medicine, University Hospital of Aarhus, Noerrebrogade 44, Building 2C, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; jpbon{at}akh.aaa.dk

Aims: To evaluate an epidemiological approach to a national noise hazard surveillance strategy, and report current exposure levels in the Danish workplace.

Methods: A study base of 840 companies in 10 selected high risk industries in the largest county in Denmark was identified from a national register. Noise exposure was measured among manual workers recruited from a random sample of workplaces in each industry. For reference, financial companies and a sample of residents were investigated according to the same protocol. The A-weighted equivalent sound level (L_Aeq) for a full shift was measured by portable dosimeters worn by 830 workers employed at 91 workplaces (67% of 136 eligible companies).

Results: The epidemiological design proved feasible and established a baseline for future noise surveillance. Substantial resources were needed to motivate workplaces to enlist and the final participation rate was less than optimal (66.9%). The L_{Aeq (8)} values in the selected industries were highly elevated (mean 83.7 dB(A) (95% CI 83.3 to 84.1) in comparison with residents and office workers (mean 69.9 dB(A), 95% CI 68.8 to 71.0). Some 50% of the workers were exposed to more than 85 dB(A) and some 20% to more than 90 dB(A) in several industries.

Conclusion: Noise levels in Danish high risk industries remain high. A substantial proportion of workers are exposed to noise levels above the current threshold limit of 85 dB(A). Ongoing surveillance of noise exposure using full shift dosimetry of workers in random samples of workplaces most at risk to high noise levels may help reinforce preventive measures. Such a programme would benefit from compulsory workplace participation.

Keywords: occupational noise; occupational exposure; monitoring; hearing loss

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• McNamee, R, Burgess, G, Dippnall, W M, Cherry, N (2006). Occupational noise exposure and ischaemic heart disease mortality. Occup. Environ. Med. 63: 813-819 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Virkkunen, H, Harma, M, Kauppinen, T, Tenkanen, L (2006). The triad of shift work, occupational noise, and physical workload and risk of coronary heart disease.. Occup. Environ. Med. 63: 378-386 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Daniell, W E, Swan, S S, McDaniel, M M, Camp, J E, Cohen, M A, Stebbins, J G (2006). Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States. Occup. Environ. Med. 63: 343-351 [Abstract] [Full Text]