Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60(Supplement 1 ):i88-i92; doi:10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i88
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60:i88
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study

G M H Swaen, L G P M van Amelsvoort, U Bültmann and IJ Kant

Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G Swaen, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands;
g.swaen{at}epid.unimaas.nl

Aims: To determine whether fatigue and need for recovery are risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident.

Methods: These associations were investigated within the Maastricht Cohort Study of "Fatigue at Work", a prospective cohort study of employees from a wide range of companies and organisations. For 7051 employees information was available on fatigue as measured with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS), need for recovery as measured with the VBBA, and possible confounding factors such as age, smoking, alcohol consumption, educational level, shift work, and work environment. Information on the risk factors was collected in May 1999 and January 2000, before the occurrence of the occupational accidents. The incidence of being injured in an occupational accident was inventoried over the year 2000. A total of 108 employees reported having been injured in an occupational accident in 2000.

Results: For the highest CIS fatigue score tertile a for age, gender, educational level, smoking, shift work, and work environment, adjusted relative risk for being injured in an occupational accident of 1.29 (95% CI: 1.03 to 2.78) was found compared to the lowest tertile, and for the highest tertile of need for recovery a relative risk of 2.28 (95% CI: 1.41 to 3.66) was found.

Conclusions: Fatigue and need for recovery were found to be independent risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident. This means that in the push back of occupational accidents, fatigue, and even more importantly need for recovery, need special attention.

Keywords: occupational accident; cohort study; fatigue; recovery


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Duijts, S F A, Kant, I J, Landeweerd, J A, Swaen, G M H (2006). Prediction of sickness absence: development of a screening instrument. Occup. Environ. Med. 63: 564-569 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van Dijk, F J H, Swaen, G M H (2003). Fatigue at work. Occup. Environ. Med. 60 : i1-i2 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs