HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swaen, G M H Articles by Kant, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swaen, G M H Articles by Kant, I.

Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study

Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G Swaen, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands;
g.swaen{at}epid.unimaas.nl

Aims: To determine whether fatigue and need for recovery are risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident.

Methods: These associations were investigated within the Maastricht Cohort Study of "Fatigue at Work", a prospective cohort study of employees from a wide range of companies and organisations. For 7051 employees information was available on fatigue as measured with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS), need for recovery as measured with the VBBA, and possible confounding factors such as age, smoking, alcohol consumption, educational level, shift work, and work environment. Information on the risk factors was collected in May 1999 and January 2000, before the occurrence of the occupational accidents. The incidence of being injured in an occupational accident was inventoried over the year 2000. A total of 108 employees reported having been injured in an occupational accident in 2000.

Results: For the highest CIS fatigue score tertile a for age, gender, educational level, smoking, shift work, and work environment, adjusted relative risk for being injured in an occupational accident of 1.29 (95% CI: 1.03 to 2.78) was found compared to the lowest tertile, and for the highest tertile of need for recovery a relative risk of 2.28 (95% CI: 1.41 to 3.66) was found.

Conclusions: Fatigue and need for recovery were found to be independent risk factors for being injured in an occupational accident. This means that in the push back of occupational accidents, fatigue, and even more importantly need for recovery, need special attention.

Keywords: occupational accident; cohort study; fatigue; recovery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S F A Duijts, I J Kant, J A Landeweerd, and G M H Swaen Prediction of sickness absence: development of a screening instrument Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2006; 63(8): 564 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F J H van Dijk and G M H Swaen Fatigue at work Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2003; 60 (2008): i1 - i2. [Full Text] [PDF]