Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Amelsvoort, L G P M
Right arrow Articles by Swaen, G M H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Amelsvoort, L G P M
Right arrow Articles by Swaen, G M H
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60:i83
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

Need for recovery after work and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease in a working population

L G P M van Amelsvoort, IJ Kant, U Bültmann, G M H Swaen

Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Ir LGPM van Amelsvoort, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands;
lgpm.vanamelsvoort{at}epid.unimaas.nl

Background: A high need for recovery after work can be regarded as a short term adverse effect of working day stressors and the person’s inability to cope and recover. Consequently, it might be an intermediate factor between job stressors and cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Aim: To investigate, in a longitudinal study, the relation between need for recovery and subsequent CVD.

Methods: Data from the Maastricht Cohort Study of 12 140 workers were used, with 42 incident self reported CVD cases during 32 months of follow up. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to calculate age, gender, smoking status, and educational level adjusted relative risks.

Results: The adjusted relative CVD risk for the second compared to the first tertile of the need for recovery score was 1.22 (95% CI: 0.49 to 3.04), and for the third compared to the first tertile was 3.16 (95% CI: 1.34 to 7.48). When need for recovery was entered as continuous score, an adjusted relative risk per SD increase of 1.54 (95% CI: 1.15 to 2.03) was found. Additional adjustment for several work related factors as job demands, did not notably change the observed relation between need for recovery and CVD. Moreover, the increased risk for subjects reporting high job demands (1.38 per SD increase; 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.92) decreased substantially after adjustment for need for recovery.

Conclusion: The results show that need for recovery is a strong predictor of subsequent cardiovascular disease and might be an intermediate factor between job stressors and cardiovascular disease.


Keywords: cardiovascular disease; need for recovery; job stress; fatigue

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease; GHQ, General Health Questionnaire; JCQ, Job Content Questionnaire; RR, relative risk




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
M. Kivimaki, P. Leino-Arjas, L. Kaila-Kangas, R. Luukkonen, J. Vahtera, M. Elovainio, M. Harma, and J. Kirjonen
Is Incomplete Recovery From Work a Risk Marker of Cardiovascular Death? Prospective Evidence From Industrial Employees
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2006; 68(3): 402 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
E M de Croon, J K Sluiter, and M H W Frings-Dresen
Psychometric properties of the Need for Recovery after work scale: test-retest reliability and sensitivity to detect change.
Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2006; 63(3): 202 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. Kivimaki, J. Head, J. E. Ferrie, H. Hemingway, M. J. Shipley, J. Vahtera, and M. G. Marmot
Working While Ill as a Risk Factor for Serious Coronary Events: The Whitehall II Study
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2005; 95(1): 98 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
F J H van Dijk and G M H Swaen
Fatigue at work
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2003; 60 (2008): i1 - i2.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.