HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brenninkmeijer, V Articles by VanYperen, N Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brenninkmeijer, V Articles by VanYperen, N

How to conduct research on burnout: advantages and disadvantages of a unidimensional approach in burnout research

University of Groningen, Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr V Brenninkmeijer, TNO Work & Employment, Team UBS2 (Social Security: Policy and Performance), PO Box 718, 2130 AS Hoofddorp, Netherlands;
v.brenninkmeijer{at}arbeid.tno.nl

When conducting research on burnout, it may be difficult to decide whether one should report results separately for each burnout dimension or whether one should combine the dimensions. Although the multidimensionality of the burnout concept is widely acknowledged, for research purposes it is sometimes convenient to regard burnout as a unidimensional construct. This article deals with the question of whether and when it may be appropriate to treat burnout as a unidimensional variable, and presents a decision rule to distinguish between people high and low in burnout. To develop a guideline for obtaining a dichotomous measure of burnout, the scores on the Utrecht Burnout Scale (UBOS) of 44 well functioning individuals were compared with the scores of 29 individuals diagnosed as suffering from burnout. Based on these data, the authors recommend the "exhaustion + 1" criterion for research in non-clinical populations. Following this criterion, individuals can be considered as burnt out when they report, compared to a norm group, high emotional exhaustion, in combination with high depersonalisation or low personal accomplishment. The criterion may be used to estimate the percentage in a sample of individuals in a state of burnout.

Keywords: burnout; occupational stress; methodology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. L. Magnusson Hanson, T. Theorell, G. Oxenstierna, M. Hyde, and H. Westerlund Demand, control and social climate as predictors of emotional exhaustion symptoms in working Swedish men and women Scand J Public Health, September 1, 2008; 36(7): 737 - 743. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Gopal, J. J. Glasheen, T. J. Miyoshi, and A. V. Prochazka Burnout and Internal Medicine Resident Work-Hour Restrictions Arch Intern Med, December 12, 2005; 165(22): 2595 - 2600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F J H van Dijk and G M H Swaen Fatigue at work Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2003; 60 (2008): i1 - i2. [Full Text] [PDF]