Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60:667-671; doi:10.1136/oem.60.9.667
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60:667-671
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Agreement between hearing thresholds measured in non-soundproof work environments and a soundproof booth

T W Wong, T S Yu, W Q Chen, Y L Chiu, C N Wong, A H S Wong

Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Tze Wai Wong, Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong;
twwong{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Aims: To study the agreement between audiometric test results measured in non-soundproof environments at the worksite, and in a soundproof booth.

Methods: In a cross sectional prevalence study on noise induced hearing loss, 885 transport workers whose hearing thresholds were measured by a standard audiometric test method in non-soundproof environments at the worksite were identified to have some hearing loss (>25 dB), and were retested in a soundproof booth.

Results: At 4–8 KHz, the mean of the absolute differences in hearing threshold obtained by these two methods was 2 dB or less. When the proportions of hearing loss (>=30 dB for any frequencies at 3–8 KHz, or >=90 dB for three low frequencies at 0.5–2 KHz, or >=90 dB for three high frequencies at 3–6 KHz) were compared, considerable differences existed. A much better agreement was obtained when the criteria for hearing loss as measured in the field test under non-soundproof conditions were relaxed by 5 dB. At 4 KHz, the difference between the proportion of subjects with hearing loss as measured in the field and that as measured in the booth was the smallest. The kappa statistic was highest at 3 and 4 KHz.

Conclusions: Audiometric test results conducted in non-soundproof environments in the field are comparable to those obtained in a soundproof environment among transport workers with a hearing loss of >25 dB. The hearing threshold at 4 KHz appears suitable for the estimation of the prevalence of hearing loss when appropriate adjustments are made in the diagnostic criteria.

Keywords: agreement; noise; hearing loss; hearing threshold

Abbreviations: ANSI, American National Standards Institute; NIHL, noise induced hearing loss


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs