Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60:438-443; doi:10.1136/oem.60.6.438
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60:438-443
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of the quality of coding of job episodes collected by self questionnaires among French retired men for use in a job-exposure matrix

C Pilorget1, E Imbernon2, M Goldberg1, S Bonenfant1, Y Spyckerelle3, B Fournier3, J Steinmetz3, A Schmaus1

1 INSERM Unité 88–IFR 69, 14 rue du Val d’Osne, 94415 Saint-Maurice, France
2 Institut de Veille Sanitaire (InVS), Département Santé Travail, 94415 Saint-Maurice, France
3 Centre technique d’appui et de formation des centres d’Examens de Santé (CETAF), 54500 Vandoeuvre lés Nancy, France

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
C Pilorget, INSERM Unité 88, 14 rue du Val d’Osne, 94415 Saint-Maurice, France;
Corinne.Pilorget{at}st-maurice.inserm.fr

Background and Aims: The ESPACES study was intended to identify retirees who may have been, according to their job descriptions, exposed to asbestos during their working lives. As part of this study, we analysed the quality of the occupation and activity sector coding as well as its effect on the subjects’ exposure status.

Methods: The occupation and activity sector for a sample of 450 retired men were coded twice (with the second coder blinded to the first result), according to the international codes for industries (ISIC-1975) and occupations (ISCO-1968). For each series, linking the information about a job episode (dates, ISIC code, ISCO code) with the matrix allowed attribution of a probability of asbestos exposure to each episode and each subject. The asbestos exposure in the two series was compared by the kappa reproducibility coefficient.

Results: The analysis concerned 425 questionnaires. There was at least one difference in the code for either activity sector (ISIC) or occupation (ISCO) in half the episodes (50.2%). The exposure status estimated by the job-exposure matrix did not change between the series for 84.7% of the subjects. The kappa coefficient was 0.64 for all questionnaires, 0.70 when the questionnaire was coded twice by the same coder, and 0.62 when coded by two different coders.

Conclusions: Despite intra- and inter-differences between coders, the coding of job episodes for the ESPACES study appears satisfactory and hence indicates that the assessment of the subjects’ asbestos exposure was assessed without major distortions. This study underlines the usefulness of employing coders specifically trained for this technique.

Keywords: job-exposure matrix; asbestos; misclassification

Abbreviations: ISCO, International Standard Classification of Occupation; ISIC, International Standard Industrial Classification of all Economic Activities; JEM, job-exposure matrix


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs