Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2002;59:442-446; doi:10.1136/oem.59.7.442
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2002;59:442-446
© 2002 Occupational and Environmental Medicine

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Clinical validation of methods of diagnosis of neuropathy in a field study of United Kingdom sheep dippers

D Buchanan1, G A Jamal3, A Pilkington2, S Hansen4

1 ISD, Scottish Executive, Edinburgh, UK
2 Wellwork Ltd, Edinburgh, UK
3 Department of Neurology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
4 Department of Neurology, INS, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S Hansen, Department of Clinical Physics, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK;
adele{at}wellwork.co.uk

Objectives: To investigate the reproducibility of measured indices of chronic peripheral neuropathy from a field study of sheep dippers when compared with similar measurements carried out in a clinical setting.

Methods: A stratified random sample of field study subjects was invited to attend a clinic. Neuropathy was measured both in the field and at the clinic with a modified version of a standard symptoms questionnaire and quantitative sensory thresholds for hot, cold, and vibration. These were combined into a classification of the likelihood of neuropathy with a neuropathy scoring system. Indicators of sensory abnormality were based on comparison of sensory thresholds to age dependent reference values derived from an external reference group.

Results: Only 51% of subjects were assigned similar classifications in the field and clinic based on the neuropathy scoring system. Of the component indices, grouped symptom scores, with 65% of subjects showing exact agreement, proved to be more reproducible than quantitative sensory test indicators. There were biases in the comparison of field and clinic measurements of hot and vibration sensations, but no evidence of greater variation between individual people in sensory thresholds in the field relative to at the clinic.

Conclusions: The neuropathy scoring system proved to be of limited reproducibility, due in a large part to the lack of reproducibility of the indicators of sensory test abnormality caused by inadequate temperature control. However, the symptoms score and measured sensory thresholds could be used separately as indices of neuropathy in exposure-response analyses.

Keywords: chronic peripheral neuropathy; reproducibility; scoring system

Abbreviations: OPs, organophosphates; Ip, index of nerve pathology; QST, quantitative sensory tests


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Jamal, G A, Hansen, S, Pilkington, A, Buchanan, D, Gillham, R A, Abdel-Azis, M, Julu, P O O, Al-Rawas, S F, Hurley, F, Ballantyne, J P (2002). A clinical neurological, neurophysiological, and neuropsychological study of sheep farmers and dippers exposed to organophosphate pesticides. Occup. Environ. Med. 59: 434-441 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs

Occupational, Public, Community health jobs