Review
Effects of drop out in a longitudinal study of musculoskeletal
disorders
C Bildta b, L Alfredssonc, L Punnettd, H Theobalde, M Torgéna, A Wikmana
a Gender
and Work, National Institute for Working Life, S-112 79 Stockholm,
Sweden, b Section of Psychology, Department of Clinical
Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, c Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska
Institute, Sweden, d Department
of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, USA, e Family Medicine, Karolinska Institute,
Sweden
Correspondence to: Dr C Bildt carina.bildt{at}niwl.se
Accepted 3 November
2000
OBJECTIVES
The drop
out rates in different longitudinal studies of musculoskeletal
disorders range between 7% and 57%, and little is known about the
characteristics of the subjects who dropped out. The aim was to analyse
various consequences of drop out in a longitudinal study of
musculoskeletal disorders and occupational risk factors during
1969-97.
METHOD
Data about
occupational conditions and health in 1969 and in 1993 were analysed.
Differences between those who participated throughout (participants)
and drop out subjects in these analyses formed the basis for
recalculations of earlier reported analyses of associations between
occupational conditions and low back pain. In the recalculation the
data were weighted to compensate for the differences.
RESULTS
More female
and male drop out subjects than participants in 1993 had monotonous
work, fewer women and more male drop out subjects had heavy lifting in
1969. In 1997, more female and male drop out subjects had had heavy
lifting and low stimulation at work in 1993. At both occasions, there
were differences between the drop out subjects and participants in
occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders. The weighted analyses resulted
in changes in risk ratio of 0.1-0.2.
CONCLUSIONS
Differences
in occupational conditions and health among participants and drop out
subjects in a longitudinal study of musculoskeletal disorders and
occupational risk factors during 1969-97 did not markedly influence
the risk ratios.
Keywords: panel study; non-response; survey method; methodological study
© 2001 by Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Relevant Article
- Ultrafine particles
- K Donaldson, V Stone, A Clouter, L Renwick, W MacNee
Occup. Environ. Med. 2001 58: 211-216.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Andersen, J H, Kaergaard, A, Mikkelsen, S, Jensen, U F, Frost, P, Bonde, J P, Fallentin, N, Thomsen, J F
(2003). Risk factors in the onset of neck/shoulder pain in a prospective study of workers in industrial and service companies. Occup. Environ. Med.
60: 649-654
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Korhonen, T, Ketola, R, Toivonen, R, Luukkonen, R, Hakkanen, M, Viikari-Juntura, E
(2003). Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units. Occup. Environ. Med.
60: 475-482
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
