Sensitisation to enzymes in the animal feed industry
M Vanhanena, T Tuomia, U Tiikkainena, O Tupaselaa, A Tuomainenb, R Luukkonena, H Nordmana
a Finnish Institute of
Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 aA, FIN-00250, Helsinki,
Finland, b Kuopio Regional Institute of Occupational
Health, PO Box 93, FIN-70701, Kuopio, Finland
Correspondence to: Dr M Vanhanen markku.vanhanen{at}occuphealth.fi
Accepted 19 October
2000
OBJECTIVES
To assess
the prevalence of enzyme sensitisation in the animal feed industry.
METHODS
A cross
sectional study was conducted in four animal feed factories, where
several enzymes had been used in powder form for 7-9 years. Before
this study, enzymes in liquid form had started to be used.
Sensitisation to enzymes was examined by skin prick and
radioallergosorbent (RAST) tests. Altogether 218 workers were tested;
140 people in various tasks in manufacturing, where exposure to various
organic dusts and to enzymes was possible, and 78 non-exposed office
workers. The workers were interviewed for work related respiratory and
skin symptoms. Total dust concentrations were measured by a gravimetric
method. The concentrations of protease and
-amylase were measured
with catalytic methods and that of xylanase with an immunological method.
RESULTS
Ten workers
(7%) were sensitised to enzymes in the exposed group of 140, whereas
none were sensitised in the non-exposed group. Six of the sensitised
people had respiratory symptoms at work: two of them especially in
connection with exposure to enzymes. Enzyme concentrations in the air
varied greatly: xylanase from less than 0.8 ng/m3 up to 16 ng/m3,
-amylase from less than 20 ng/m3 up
to 200 ng/m3, and protease from less than 0.4 ng/m3up to 2900 ng/m3. On average, highest
xylanase and
-amylase concentrations were found in the various
manufacturing sites, whereas the highest protease concentrations were
found in areas of high total dust.
CONCLUSIONS
Industrial
enzymes may cause allergies in the animal feed industry. There is a
need to assess exposure to enzymes at various phases of production, and
to minimise exposures.
Keywords: animal feed; enzyme allergy; occupational exposure
© 2001 by Occupational and Environmental Medicine
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
MADSEN, A. M., KRUSE, P., SCHNEIDER, T.
(2006). Characterization of Microbial Particle Release from Biomass and Building Material Surfaces for Inhalation Exposure Risk Assessment. ANN OCCUP HYG
50: 175-187
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Kalogeromitros, D, Rigopoulos, D, Gregoriou, S, Mousatou, V, Lyris, N, Papaioannou, D, Katsarou-Katsari, A
(2004). Asymptomatic sensitisation to grapes in a sample of workers in the wine industry. Occup. Environ. Med.
61: 709-711
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Stickler, M., Rochanayon, N., Razo, O. J., Mucha, J., Gebel, W., Faravashi, N., Chin, R., Holmes, S., Harding, F. A.
(2004). An In Vitro Human Cell-Based Assay to Rank the Relative Immunogenicity of Proteins. Toxicol Sci
77: 280-289
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
