Neurobehavioural effects of occupational exposure to cadmium: a cross sectional epidemiological study
M K Viaenea, R Masscheleina, J Leendersb, M De Groofc, L J V C Swertsb, H A Roelsd
a Department of
Occupational Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, b Department of Neurology, Sint-Dimpna Hospital,
Geel, Belgium, c Occupational Health Service, Union
Minière-Balen, Belgium, d Unité
de Toxicologie Industrielle et Médecine du Travail, Université
Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Correspondence to: Dr MK Viaene, Neurotoxicology Unit, OPZ, Pas 200, 2440 Geel, Belgium
Accepted 27 August
1999
BACKGROUND
A
patient with unexplained minor behavioural changes associated with an
axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy had a history of chronic
occupational exposure to cadmium (Cd). Although animal studies have
shown that Cd is a potent neurotoxicant, little is known about its
toxicity for the human central nervous system. The aim of this study
was to investigate the toxic potential of chronic occupational exposure
to Cd on neurobehavioural functions.
METHODS
A
cross sectional epidemiological study was conducted in a group of Cd
workers and an age matched control group. Eighty nine adult men (42 exposed to Cd and 47 control workers) were given a blinded standardised
examination that consisted of computer assisted neurobehavioural tests
(neurobehavioural examination system), a validated questionnaire to
assess neurotoxic complaints (neurotoxicity symptom checklist-60,
NSC-60), and a standardised self administered questionnaire to detect
complaints consistent with peripheral neuropathy and dysfunction of the
autonomic nervous system. Historical and current data on biomonitoring
of exposure to Cd, either the highest value of Cd in urine (CdU in µg
Cd/g creatinine) of each Cd worker during work (CdUmax) or
the current value (CdUcurrent) of each control, were
available as well as data on microproteinuria.
RESULTS
Cd
workers (CdUmax: mean (range), 12.6 (0.4-38.4)) performed
worse than the controls (CdUcurrent: mean (range), 0.7 (0.1-2.0)) on visuomotor tasks, symbol digit substitution (p=0.008),
and simple reaction time to direction (p=0.058) or location (p=0.042) of a stimulus. In multiple linear regression analysis, symbol digit
substitution, simple direction reaction time test, and simple location
reaction time test were significantly related to CdUmax, (
=0.35 ( p<0.001),
= 0.25 (p=0.012), and
=0.23 (p=0.021)
respectively). More complaints consistent with peripheral neuropathy
(p=0.004), complaints about equilibrium (p=0.015), and complaints about
concentration ability (p=0.053) were found in the group exposed to Cd
than in the control group, and these variables correlated positively
with CdUmax (peripheral neuropathy:
=0.38, p<0.001;
equilibrium:
=0.22, p=0.057; concentration ability:
=0.27,
p=0.020).
CONCLUSION
Slowing
of visuomotor functioning on neurobehavioural testing and increase in
complaints consistent with peripheral neuropathy, complaints about
equilibrium, and complaints about concentration ability were dose
dependently associated with CdU. Age, exposure to other neurotoxicants,
or status of renal function could not explain these findings. The
present study also indicates that an excess of complaints may be
detected in Cd workers before signs of microproteinuria induced by Cd occur.
Keywords: cadmium; neurotoxicity; occupational exposure
© 2000 by Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
