Occup Environ Med 2000;57:1-9 ( January )

Methodology

Reporting of occupational and environmental research: use and misuse of statistical and epidemiological methods Lesley Rushton

MRC Institute for Environment and Health, University of Leicester, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Lesley Rushton, MRC Institute for Environment and Health, University of Leicester, 94 Regent Road, Leicester LE1 7DD, UK

Accepted 1 September 1999

OBJECTIVESTo report some of the most serious omissions and errors which may occur in papers submitted to Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and to give guidelines on the essential components that should be included in papers reporting results from studies of occupational and environmental health.
METHODSSince 1994 Occupational and Environmental Medicine has used a panel of medical statisticians to review submitted papers which have a substantial statistical content. Although some studies may have genuine errors in their design, execution, and analysis, many of the problems identified during the reviewing process are due to inadequate and incomplete reporting of essential aspects of a study. This paper outlines some of the most important errors and omissions that may occur. Observational studies are often the preferred choice of design in occupational and environmental medicine. Some of the issues relating to design, execution, and analysis which should be considered when reporting three of the most common observational study designs, cross sectional, case-control, and cohort are described. An illustration of good reporting practice is given for each. Various mathematical modelling techniques are often used in the analysis of these studies, the reporting of which causes a major problem to some authors. Suggestions for the presentation of results from modelling are made.
CONCLUSIONSThere is increasing interest in the development and application of formal "good epidemiology practices". These not only consider issues of data quality, study design, and study conduct, but through their structured approach to the documentation of the study procedures, provide the potential for more rigorous reporting of the results in the scientific literature.


Keywords: research reporting; statistical methods; epidemiological methods

---

© 2000 by Occupational and Environmental Medicine
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• O'Neil, C. E., Nicklas, T. A. (2008). A Review of the Relationship Between 100% Fruit Juice Consumption and Weight in Children and Adolescents. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE 2: 315-354 [Abstract]  
• Vandenbroucke, J. P., Elm, E. v., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., for the STROBE initiative, (2007). Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration. ANN INTERN MED 147: W-163-W-194 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Martin, O. V., Lester, J. N., Voulvoulis, N., Boobis, A. R. (2007). Human Health and Endocrine Disruption: A Simple Multicriteria Framework for the Qualitative Assessment of End Point Specific Risks in a Context of Scientific Uncertainty. Toxicol Sci 98: 332-347 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Novack, L, Jotkowitz, A, Knyazer, B, Novack, V (2006). Evidence-based medicine: assessment of knowledge of basic epidemiological and research methods among medical doctors. Postgrad. Med. J. 82: 817-822 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Neville, J. A., Lang, W., Fleischer, A. B. Jr (2006). Errors in the archives of dermatology and the journal of the american academy of dermatology from january through december 2003.. Arch Dermatol 142: 737-740 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tooth, L., Ware, R., Bain, C., Purdie, D. M., Dobson, A. (2005). Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research. Am J Epidemiol 161: 280-288 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pocock, S. J, Collier, T. J, Dandreo, K. J, de Stavola, B. L, Goldman, M. B, Kalish, L. A, Kasten, L. E, McCormack, V. A (2004). Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice. BMJ 329: 883- [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ong, E. K., Glantz, S. A. (2001). Constructing ""Sound Science"" and ""Good Epidemiology"": Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms. AJPH 91: 1749-1757 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• LOOMIS, D, RUSHTON, L (2001). Occupational exposures and pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.. Occup. Environ. Med. 58: 63-64 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Reporting of occupational and environmental research

Dana Loomis

Occup Environ Med Online, 18 Sep 2000 [Full text]

Re: Reporting of occupational and environmental research - author's reply

Lesley Rushton

Occup Environ Med Online, 19 Sep 2000 [Full text]